Lacoste: Disrupting Wholesale Counterfeit Supply in Hanoi’s Old Quarter – 1,073 Items Seized, Factory-Scale Source Neutralized, Administrative Fine Imposed

in IPR enforecement, Notable Articles, Trademark in Vietnam, Vietnam

KENFOX IP & Law Office represented Lacoste in a coordinated anti-counterfeiting action targeting two apparel shops in Hanoi’s Old Quarter that, following pre-raid investigation, were confirmed to be operating as upstream wholesalers of counterfeit Lacoste garments. After compiling evidence that these locations were supplying fake “LACOSTE” and crocodile-logo apparel into the broader Hanoi retail network, we escalated the case to the Inspectorate of the Ministry of Science & Technology (IMOST) for administrative enforcement. IMOST conducted raids on the identified premises, seizing 1,073 counterfeit garments and imposing administrative fines totaling VND 183,360,000 on the two wholesalers. The seized inventory was ordered...

04 November

0 Comments

Sticky

Shutting Down Lookalike Packaging Through Unfair Competition Law – PROSPAN vs. PROSTIBAME

Posted by Vu Thu Uyen

in IPR enforecement, Notable Articles, Trademark, Vietnam

KENFOX IP & Law Office acted for Engelhard Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG. (Germany), owner of the “PROSPAN” cough remedy brand ( ), and its exclusive Vietnamese distributor, SOHACO, after a Vietnamese company (VINH AN THANG LONG Investment JSC) began marketing a PROSTIBAME cough “dietary supplement” in packaging deliberately modeled on PROSPAN’s presentation. The infringer avoided direct trademark conflict by using a different word mark (“PROSTIBAME”) (), and PROSPAN’s outer packaging had not been separately registered as a “trademark” or an “industrial design” in Vietnam - making a traditional infringement claim difficult. KENFOX responded by treating the dispute as an...

05 March

0 Comments

Sticky

Genuine Goods, Trademark Infringement: The Rule One Proteins Victory in Vietnam

Posted by Vu Thu Uyen

in IPR enforecement, Trademark, Vietnam

[vc_row triangle_shape="no"][vc_column][vc_column_text]Download Selling real products doesn't automatically give you the right to advertise using someone else's trademark. The Rule One Proteins case in Vietnam clearly demonstrates this important principle of intellectual property law. This case, in which KENFOX IP & Law Office successfully represented the trademark holder, shows that even when the goods are genuine, unauthorized use of the trademark for advertising and sales is infringement. Background: Rule One Proteins and the Vietnamese Market Rule One Proteins, LLC (RULE ONE), a US-based company with roots tracing back to the founders of the renowned Optimum Nutrition (ON) brand, has established itself as a leader...

04 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Novartis AG Triumphs in the Journey to Protect Vildagliptin Patent in Vietnam

Posted by Quyen Nguyen

in IPR enforecement, Patent

Novartis AG, a leading global pharmaceutical corporation, holds the patent for the active ingredient “Vildagliptin”, a crucial component in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. In Vietnam, this groundbreaking invention is protected under Patent No. 5529. Soon after, counterfeit products emerged in the market, significantly cheaper than the genuine product, causing confusion among consumers. Novartis AG did not stand idly by. Extensive investigative efforts revealed the reality: Novartis AG’s patented product was being severely infringed upon in Vietnam....