05 November

Sticky

RULE ONE: Forcing VIPRI to Reverse Itself, Establishing Trademark Infringement, and Shutting Down Unauthorized Online Sales

[vc_row triangle_shape="no"][vc_column][vc_column_text] Download 1. Snapshot of the Case KENFOX IP & Law Office represented RULE ONE PROTEINS LLC (“RULE ONE”), a-US based company, the registered owner in Vietnam of the “RULE 1 PROTEINS” () trademark (Registration No. 408163), in an action against Muscle Up Joint Stock Company, a Vietnamese seller that was advertising, offering for sale, and promoting nutritional supplements in Vietnam using “RULE 1 PROTEINS”, “RULE 1 R1 PROTEIN”, and “RULE ONE” across websites and Facebook pages without authorization. We first secured Bailiff’s Certification to capture irrefutable evidence of infringement across Muscle Up’s online channels. We then requested an “Expert Opinion” (in...

05 November

0 Comments

Sticky

From Online Camouflage to Physical Crackdown: KENFOX’s Legal Strategy in the LACTOMASON Case

Posted by Quyen Nguyen

in Notable Articles, Trademark, Viet Nam

[vc_row triangle_shape="no"][vc_column][vc_column_text]Download 1. Snapshot of the Case In July-August 2025, KENFOX IP & Law Office executed a coordinated anti-counterfeiting operation in Hanoi on behalf of a leading South Korean pharmaceutical company, holder of the registered “LACTOMASON” trademark in Vietnam. The infringer was not a “street-level counterfeiter”, but a sophisticated entity constructed to project lawful legitimacy. Operating under the guise of “Lacto Mason Vietnam Co., Ltd.”, the infringer built a complete façade of brand authenticity by copying nearly the entire identity ecosystem of our client - including product packaging, labeling, corporate name, website, social-media presence, and promotional collateral - and then deploying a digital-only...

04 November

0 Comments

Sticky

Trademark Enforcement Beyond Products: Forcing a Vietnamese Company to Change Its Name and Surrender a Confusing Domain to the US trademark holder

Posted by Quyen Nguyen

in Notable Articles, Trademark, Viet Nam

Download 1. Snapshot of the Case IMOST Action Forces Name Change and Domain Transfer Despite Prior-Use and Coexistence Defenses KENFOX IP & Law Office represented CVX Pharmacy, a U.S. retail pharmacy chain with registered trademarks in Vietnam covering pharmaceutical products (Class 05) and medical apparatus (Class 10), in an action against a Vietnamese company (“CVX Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.”) that had adopted a company name highly similar to CVX’s mark and registered a matching domain/website to present itself as if affiliated with CVX. The matter was complicated by the presence of another Vietnamese company (“CVX Medicine Trading Co., Ltd”) whose almost identical company name...

22 August

0 Comments

Sticky

Trademark Enforcement in Laos: A Smart Strategy in a High-Risk Region

Posted by Quyen Nguyen

in Laos, Notable Articles, Trademark

What are the options for a trademark owner if their trademark is illegally used in Laos - one of Southeast Asia's most challenging jurisdictions? This was the critical question facing Luk Fook Company, a leading international jewelry brand, when its trademark was found to be in unauthorized use at a storefront within the Golden Triangle Special Economic Zone, a region in Bokeo Province, Laos, known for its legal ambiguity and illicit activities. Although enforcement in such jurisdictions may appear impractical or fraught with risk, Luk Fook Company’s enforcement strategy demonstrates that targeted legal intervention, executed with precision and discretion, can yield...

31 July

0 Comments

Sticky

How wilful trademark infringement is recognised in Vietnam?

Posted by Quyen Nguyen

in Notable Articles, Trademark, Vietnam

Download In Vietnam, wilful trademark infringement is recognized when someone knowingly and intentionally uses a protected trademark without the owner's permission, in a way that causes confusion or exploits the brand’s reputation. Willful trademark infringement is recognized through both administrative and criminal actions. Administrative actions involve imposing fines and other penalties by authorities for infringing activities, while criminal actions, involving more severe penalties, are pursued when the infringement is considered to be on a commercial scale or involves counterfeit goods. The deliberate and intentional nature of an infringement not only affects the severity of penalties but also influences the overall approach to combating...

28 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Successful Raid Against Trademark Infringement of LACTOMASON: A Significant Victory for KENFOX and Market Surveillance Team No. 1

Posted by Quyen Nguyen

in Notable Articles, Trademark, Vietnam

Download Intellectual property (“IP”) rights are not merely a legal title, but a vital tool to safeguard corporate value - rights that only become meaningful when effectively enforced and promptly protected. On July 24, 2025, a critical legal milestone was achieved in the enforcement of IP rights for LACTOMASON CO., LTD., a reputable enterprise from South Korea. On this date, KENFOX IP & Law Office, in close coordination with Market Surveillance Team No. 1, successfully conducted an inspection and enforcement action against a serious infringement at the premises of Lacto Mason Vietnam Co., Ltd., located at 112 Nam Van Lung, An Khanh...

22 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Trademark Containing the Name of an International Organization: How Did KENFOX Successfully Appeal a Rejected Trademark in Cambodia?

Posted by Quyen Nguyen

in Cambodia, Notable Articles, Trademark

Download In practice, trademarks containing geographical names or abbreviations of intergovernmental organizations are often refused registration by national IP offices on the grounds that they violate prohibitions against the use of symbols, emblems, or names of states or international organizations. However, KENFOX IP & Law Office recently succeeded in assisting the owner of an international trademark registration under the Madrid System in overturning a provisional refusal issued by the Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) of Cambodia. The refusal pertained to the mark “CONEASEAN” registered under International Registration No. 1523889, which seeks protection for goods in Classes 16 and 30. Legal Barrier: Use of...

21 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Trademark Refusal in Cambodia: How “MONTECONO” Overcame Two Cited Marks?

Posted by Quyen Nguyen

in Notable Articles, Trademark

In the complex landscape of cross-border trademark protection, it is not uncommon for marks designated for protection in Cambodia under the Madrid System to face provisional refusals. Yet the challenge escalates significantly when the grounds for refusal stem not from similarity to a single cited mark, but to two well-established trademarks simultaneously. This is more than a procedural setback; it places the applicant before a near-impenetrable legal framework, where the line between similarity and likelihood of confusion becomes a focal point of intricate legal debate....

11 July

0 Comments

Sticky

Easy to Register – Hard to Keep: Emerging Challenges in Trademark Protection in Laos

Posted by Quyen Nguyen

in Notable Articles, Trademark

In Laos, securing a trademark registration is streamlined by a first-to-file system. However, the true challenge for trademark owners lies in understanding and adhering to the post-registration "use" requirements. KENFOX IP & Law Office, with its consistent recognition for expertise in Lao trademark and patent law, has a proven track record of assisting international and domestic clients in both securing and enforcing their IP rights. We would like to offer a detailed overview of trademark use requirements in Laos, exploring key post-registration obligations, the implications of non-use, and practical strategies for safeguarding your valuable brand assets in the Lao market....

09 July

0 Comments

Sticky

KENFOX Overturns Trademark Refusal for “MINIX” After Nine-Year Appeal in Vietnam

Posted by Quyen Nguyen

in Notable Articles, Trademark

KENFOX IP & Law Office has secured a significant victory for its client, Minix Technology Ltd., a Shenzhen, China-based technology company. After nine years of persistent pursuit, KENFOX successfully persuaded the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (IPVN) to grant protection for the "MINIX" trademark in Class 09. This success not only affirms Minix Technology Ltd.'s legitimate rights but also establishes a valuable legal precedent for similar cases in the future....