18 October

Sticky

Trademark Use in Vietnam: How to Correctly Understand and Effectively Rebut Non-Use Cancellation Attacks

[vc_row triangle_shape="no"][vc_column][vc_column_text] Download In Vietnam, owning a trademark registration is only half the battle - keeping it alive is where the real challenge begins. Many foreign businesses secure broad protection for their brands across a wide range of goods and services, only to discover years later that their registrations are vulnerable to non-use cancellation. What if your products haven’t yet entered the Vietnamese market? What if your app or website is used by Vietnamese consumers but your company is based abroad? Does that count as “use”? Vietnam’s IP Law draws a fine line between registered rights and active rights - and the distinction...

03 October

0 Comments

Sticky

Identical Filing Dates, Identical Marks: Vietnam’s Resolution Mechanism and How Businesses Should Respond?

Posted by Dương Thúy

in Notable Articles, Trademark, Viet Nam

Download In practice, it is not uncommon for two entirely independent entities to file applications to protect an identical or similar sign for the same goods/services - sometimes even on the very same day. What may appear to be a mere coincidence, however, presents an intriguing legal question: when both applications satisfy the filing-date requirement equally, who has priority? Who will be the lawful owner of the mark? In a rare case, a client of KENFOX IP & Law Office - Eurotek Vietnam Lubricants Co., Ltd. (Công ty TNHH Dầu nhớt Eurotek Việt Nam) - filed an application for the mark “”...

30 September

0 Comments

Sticky

A New Hub for IP in Vietnam & ASEAN: KENFOX Named Partner for Shandong’s Overseas Work Platform

Posted by Dương Thúy

in News

[vc_row triangle_shape="no"][vc_column][vc_column_text] KENFOX IP & Law Office was honored to host a distinguished delegation from Shandong Province on 26 September 2025. The delegation was led by Mr. Wu Chengbing, the Director of the Shandong Provincial Market Supervision Bureau, who also serves as the Director of the Shandong Provincial Intellectual Property (IP) Bureau. Accompanying him were senior officials including: Mr. Zhao Jiatao (赵加涛), Director of the IP Promotion Division and First-Class Investigator Mr. Ping Guofang (平国防), First-Class Investigator of the Science and Informatization Division Mr. Yang Fengjiang (杨沣江), Deputy Director of the Shandong Institute of Standardization Ms. Wang Rui, Chief Engineer and...

26 September

0 Comments

Sticky

“Bad Faith”, “Conflict of Rights”, and “IP Abuse” in Vietnam: What Lessons Can Be Drawn from the “Foellie” Trademark Dispute?

Posted by Dương Thúy

in Notable Articles, Trademark, Vietnam

[vc_row triangle_shape="no"][vc_column][vc_column_text] Download On 15 September 2025, the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (“VN IPO”) issued a Decision No. 205432/QĐ-SHTT annulling the validity of Certificate of Trademark Registration No. 525787 for “FOELLIE” in the name of Lưu Ngọc Anh, thereby ending four years of dispute and bringing an end to a pattern of abusive assertions of IP rights. For Laorganic Co., Ltd. (Korea) - the true proprietor of the “” (“Foellie”) mark - this Decision is not merely a matter of victory or defeat. Beyond restoring their name as the rightful owner, it revives the entire commercial flow that had been throttled...

22 September

0 Comments

Sticky

Trademarks in the Metaverse: How to Effectively Protect Trademarks for “Physical” Products in the Virtual Space in Vietnam?

Posted by Dương Thúy

in Notable Articles, Trademark in Vietnam

[vc_row triangle_shape="no"][vc_column][vc_column_text] Download Trademark disputes are becoming increasingly diverse, complex, and unceasing. Does the owner of a trademark for a “physical” automobile or watch, protected in Vietnam, China, or any other country, have the right to prevent a "virtual" version of the same product from appearing in an online game - with its logo intact and players willing to spend real money to acquire it? In a broader sense: Can using a mark on a virtual goods infringe the trademark for a physical goods? Traditionally, trademark infringement has been assessed based on the likelihood of confusion, in which the similarity between goods...

17 September

0 Comments

Sticky

Freedom to Operate (FTO) in Vietnam: Why and How you can conduct an FTO before product launching?

Posted by Dương Thúy

in Notable Articles, Patent, Viet Nam

[vc_row triangle_shape="no"][vc_column][vc_column_text] Download Launching a product in Vietnam without an FTO check is like driving at night with the headlights off, possible, but risky and expensive. Vietnam recognizes utility solutions (utility models), a powerful doctrine of equivalents in infringement analysis, and broad “Bolar”-style regulatory approval exceptions. Knowing which of these helps you, and which hurts you, often decides whether your launch flies or stalls. For foreign enterprises considering entry into the Vietnamese market, conducting a Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) search is not a simple administrative box to check; it is a critical, proactive tool for risk mitigation and strategic business planning. In a rapidly evolving...

28 August

0 Comments

Sticky

Punitive Damages in Trademark Infringement: From a Chinese Precedent to a Legal Void in Vietnam

Posted by Dương Thúy

in Notable Articles, Trademark, Vietnam

[vc_row triangle_shape="no"][vc_column][vc_column_text] Download The act of “repeat infringement” has long been considered a basis for imposing harsher sanctions, including punitive damages. China’s legal system expressly allows this approach, but proving repeat infringement in practice requires a clear and convincing chain of evidence. A recent ruling by the People’s Court of Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, in a dispute involving Cartier, illustrates how Chinese courts evaluate evidence to establish repeat infringement and justify punitive damages. The case highlights the practical methods right holders can employ to strengthen their claims, while also exposing the current legal gap in Vietnam, where punitive damages remain unavailable. Background Cartier, a globally...

25 August

0 Comments

Sticky

Trademark Cancellation for Non-Use in Vietnam: What Valuable Lessons Can Be Drawn?

Posted by Dương Thúy

in Notable Articles, Trademark, Viet Nam

Download The trademark cancelaltion request against Trademark Registration Certificate No. 103943 (“DD DANTI, device”), filed and pursued by KENFOX IP & Law Office, lasted for a decade and has become a landmark case in the field of intellectual property (IP) in Vietnam. What initially appeared to be a straightforward matter of cancelling a trademark for non-use turned into a complex legal battle between enterprises competing to defend and secure their IP rights. This case has helped to more clearly define the regulations on "use of a trademark" under Article 124.5 of Vietnam’s IP Law, limiting ambiguous interpretations and preventing the abuse of...

22 August

0 Comments

Sticky

Trademark Assignment in Vietnam: Why It’s Refused and How to Overcome It?

Posted by Dương Thúy

in Notable Articles, Trademark, Viet Nam

Trademark assignment in Vietnam is subject to strict statutory requirements and substantive examination by the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (“IPVN”). In practice, assignments are frequently refused on grounds of potential confusion or non-compliance with mandatory provisions. Challenges become more acute if the assignor owns trademarks that are closely similar to one another or, in more serious circumstances, where the assignor’s trade name itself is also the trademark name. KENFOX IP & Law Office, with over 15 years of practical experience and expertise in IP protection in Vietnam, provides in-depth analysis of the risks associated with trademark assignment, along with strategic...