KENFOX IP & Law Office > Our Practice  > Vietnam  > IP Practice (Page 3)

New product launch: How to keep your product design from being “stolen”?

For products where the external appearance provides part or all of the brand identity for consumers, protecting the external form is as important as protecting the trademark. The success of a product is often influenced by its external appearance. In a trend where consumers tend to focus on the aesthetics of a product, the appearance of a product can often be equivalent to or, in some cases, more important than its function....

Continue reading

IP protection for to-be-launched products in Vietnam: How to optimize?

Among the 10 ASEAN countries, Vietnam is considered a key market for many foreign businesses, with great development potential. Entering the Vietnamese market with new products offers significant potential, but also presents challenges. However, intellectual property rights (IPRs) are especially crucial in Vietnam, where counterfeiting can be a significant challenge. However, reality shows that many businesses often only care about IPRs protection when they discover that their products have been copied or imitated by a third party. This leads to businesses losing their competitive advantage and making it difficult to handle IPRs infringement....

Continue reading

Beyond First-to-File: How Copyright Won a Trademark Battle in Vietnam?

First-to-file is not an absolute and immutable principle in establishing trademark rights. In a broader sense, it is not at default that when you are the first filer of the trademark, you will automatically be the trademark owner in perpetuity in Vietnam. A trademark registration certificate issued by the IP Office of Vietnam (IP VIETNAM) is not automatically a legal tool to protect you from allegations of intellectual property infringement. We provide a typical copyright-trademark conflict case in Vietnam to demonstrate significance of copyright in winning trademark disputes. If not for earlier copyright, the legitimate owner would not be able...

Continue reading

What are Key Considerations for Industrial Design Divisional Application in Vietnam ?

Industrial design (ID) protection holds significant importance in the business strategies of designers and manufacturers, as it has the potential to enhance the value of products showcasing unique designs and attract customers. In Vietnam, ID can be protected by filing an ID application with the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (IP VIETNAM). In case the ID application meets the protection criteria, it will be granted an industrial design patent. This grants the design patent holder exclusive ownership and usage rights over the granted design, and it also provides the design patent holder with rights to prevent copying or imitation without...

Continue reading

Facing a Trademark Refusal in Vietnam? Learn How to Appeal and Win

Have you invested time and effort into crafting the perfect trademark, only to see it rejected by the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (IP Vietnam)? Don’t give up! Trademark refusals can be frustrating, but they aren’t necessarily the end of the road. There are still options for challenging the decision and potentially securing your trademark registration. Our firm, KENFOX IP & Law Office provides a clear breakdown of the appeal process in Vietnam, equipping you with critical information to pursue a successful appeal....

Continue reading

Chinese Character Trademarks: Still Protected or Outdated?

This question is attracting the attention of many businesses and individuals using trademarks containing Chinese characters in Vietnam. Before 2005, trademarks consisting solely of Chinese characters were considered inherently distinctive and were granted protection if they met the required standards and conditions. The protection of trademarks containing only Chinese characters was in accordance with the provisions of the Industrial Property (IP) law in effect from 1982 to 2005....

Continue reading

Handling intellectual property rights infringement in Vietnam: Which measures are effective?

Protecting intellectual property rights (IPR) involves the use of legal measures by state agencies and IPR holders to protect the ownership of their IP objects, prevent any infringement to ensure the integrity of these assets. Protecting IPRs entails not only preventing actual acts of infringement but also addressing and resolving infringements in order to cease the infringement and seek compensation for damages incurred....

Continue reading

Stream-Ripping: Vietnam and the Battle Against Online Content Piracy

Did you know that every time you download music or videos from YouTube using unofficial tools, you are participating in potential copyright infringement? This behavior, which extends from music to videos to TV shows downloaded without the copyright owner’s permission, not only violates the law but also seriously affects the revenue and creativity of artists. Known as “Stream ripping”, this practice of copying online content is not only popular in Vietnam but is also considered one of the biggest challenges facing the global entertainment industry. The negative impacts of online content piracy on artists and content creators can be severe...

Continue reading

PaaS: Piracy as a Service

"PaaS" stands for "Piracy as a Service." This is a play on the more common term "Platform as a Service" in the technology industry, which refers to providing a platform allowing customers to develop, run, and manage applications without the complexity of building and maintaining the infrastructure typically associated with developing and launching an app. "Piracy as a Service" refers to services or platforms that facilitate or enable piracy by providing the necessary infrastructure, technology, and often a vast library of unauthorized digital content like movies, TV shows, or software. These platforms make it easy for other websites or end users...

Continue reading

Safe habors

In the context of copyright law, "safe harbors" refer to legal provisions that provide immunity or protection to Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and other online intermediaries from liability for the copyright infringement activities of their users, as long as the intermediaries meet certain specified conditions. These provisions are designed to balance the rights of copyright holders with the practicalities of online service operation, enabling the digital economy to flourish while also protecting intellectual property rights. To qualify for safe harbor protection, ISPs and other intermediaries generally must: [1] Not have actual knowledge of the infringing activity or, in cases where they do...

Continue reading