KENFOX IP & Law Office > Our Practice  > Vietnam (Page 2)

The Stolichnaya Vodka Lawsuit in Vietnam: What Intellectual Property Issues Should Be Considered?

The Russian vodka brand, long considered a symbol of culture, quality, and luxury, is facing serious legal challenges globally, including in Vietnam. The decades-long dispute over intellectual property (IP) rights for famous vodka brands such as Stolichnaya has exposed pressing issues in brand protection in Vietnam, especially in the context of international economic integration. The recent lawsuit in the Hanoi People's Court between Spirits International B.V. (SPI) and FKP Sojuzplodoimport (FKP) has once again ignited heated debate over intellectual property rights, raising important questions about fundamental legal principles such as: the criteria for determining ownership of a trademark, the role of...

Continue reading

From China to Vietnam: Refurbished Goods – 4 Key Points and 4 Typical Cases Businesses Need to Know

Opening the market for refurbished goods from other member countries is Vietnam's commitment when participating in new-generation free trade agreements with high standards and covering many areas such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), the Free Trade Agreement between Vietnam and the European Union (EVFTA), or the Free Trade Agreement between Vietnam and the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland (UKVFTA)....

Continue reading

Specialized IP Court: A “Revolution” in Resolving IP Disputes in Vietnam

[vc_row triangle_shape="no"][vc_column][vc_column_text] Download  The significant increase in the number and complexity of intellectual property (IP) disputes in Vietnam, coupled with the limitations of current administrative and criminal measures, has necessitated the establishment of a specialized judiciary in Vietnam. The IP Court, expected to be established in the near future, will assume this crucial role, with jurisdiction over IP-related cases as stipulated in the Civil Procedure Code. The advent of the IP Court promises to revolutionize the way IP disputes are resolved, providing a more efficient, specialized, and predictable legal process for both domestic and foreign IP rights holders. Current IP landscape in Vietnam:...

Continue reading

From China to Vietnam: Can Unfair Competition Law Be Used to Address Trademark Squatting?

In China and Vietnam, the legal landscape for trademark protection is undergoing significant transformations. For years, rights holders have struggled to combat the widespread practice of trademark squatting, where bad-faith actors exploit the "first-to-file" principle to register and hoard trademarks, unfairly profiting from the efforts of legitimate owners. However, recent court rulings, such as Bayer v. Li Qing and Emerson v. Hemeiquan, have begun to shift the landscape, interpreting unfair competition laws more broadly. These decisions have created new legal tools that empower brand owners to protect their IP rights. These changes in the legal system are reshaping how businesses...

Continue reading

When New Facts Will Be Accepted for an IP Appeal in Vietnam?

Protecting intellectual property (IP) rights in Vietnam can be fraught with challenges, particularly when faced with unfavorable decisions issued by the IP Office of Vietnam (IPVN). One such hurdle lies in the complex and evolving landscape of "new facts" in IP appeal proceedings. What constitutes a "new fact"? When can it be introduced? And how does this impact the outcome of an appeal? These questions have perplexed IP rights holders and practitioners alike. As Vietnam's IP landscape evolves, so too do the rules governing "new facts", creating both opportunities and challenges for those seeking to protect their intellectual assets....

Continue reading

From China to Vietnam: Are Individual Voices Protected by Intellectual Property?

Voices play a multifaceted role in human society, serving as tools for communication, identity verification, and even artistic expression. Individual voices represent a unique and valuable intangible asset, holding significance both personally and commercially. However, the rapid advancement of AI technology has raised novel questions regarding the intellectual property (IP) protection of individual voices regarding the IP protection of individual voices...

Continue reading

Gathering Convincing Evidence: The Key to Success in Protecting Non-Traditional Trademarks in Vietnam

In intellectual property (IP) disputes involving non-traditional trademarks (such as product shape, color, fragrance, sound, moving images, etc.), gathering compelling evidence to prove the link between the non-traditional element and the brand plays a crucial role and directly affects the outcome of the case. Failure to prove the distinctiveness of non-traditional trademarks can lead to serious legal risks for the owner, such as trademark refusal, loss of exclusive rights to the non-traditional element, and trademark infringement lawsuits....

Continue reading

PCT Applications Designating or Selecting Vietnam: Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them?

Many patent applicants mistakenly believe that having their Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications formally accepted and published by WIPO guarantees the safety of patent protection in Vietnam. However, this is far from the truth. Numerous PCT applications designating or selecting protection in Vietnam have been met with preliminary rejection notices or even outright refusals from the Vietnam Intellectual Property Office (VNIPO). These legal setbacks stem from a failure to recognize potential rejection risks, non-compliance with Vietnamese IP laws, and inadequate strategies for rectifying errors....

Continue reading

Novartis AG Triumphs in the Journey to Protect Vildagliptin Patent in Vietnam

Novartis AG, a leading global pharmaceutical corporation, holds the patent for the active ingredient “Vildagliptin”, a crucial component in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. In Vietnam, this groundbreaking invention is protected under Patent No. 5529. Soon after, counterfeit products emerged in the market, significantly cheaper than the genuine product, causing confusion among consumers. Novartis AG did not stand idly by. Extensive investigative efforts revealed the reality: Novartis AG’s patented product was being severely infringed upon in Vietnam....

Continue reading