KENFOX IP & Law Office > Our Practice (Page 2)

“TIGER” vs. “Two Red Tigers” in Laos: How KENFOX Prevented Trademark Infringement Risks for HEINEKEN?

When a brand gains immense recognition and influence, it often becomes a target for imitators. As “TIGER” beer has become a global icon, it has faced increasingly complex challenges, especially, commercial paraticism. Recently, HEINEKEN is a global and internationally recognized leader in the beverage production and supply business, including but not limited to beer detected a third party in Vietnam filed an International Registration under the Madrid System for the mark “TWO RED TIGERS” designating various countries, including Laos....

Continue reading

“Similar” product packaging: How to handle unfair competition and copyright legislation in Vietnam?

Vietnam’s consumer goods market is booming, and this growth attracts copycats. Many Chinese brands investing in Vietnam discover that soon after their products hit store shelves, competitors launch look‑alike packaging. Such imitation not only dilutes brand value but can also mislead consumers and divert sales. KENFOX IP & Law Office provides analysis on how Vietnamese unfair‑competition and copyright law can be used to fight look‑alike packaging, highlights real‑world cases, and offers practical guidance for Chinese multinational enterprises planning to sell in Vietnam....

Continue reading

Trademark Use in Vietnam: How to Correctly Understand and Effectively Rebut Non-Use Cancellation Attacks

In Vietnam, owning a trademark registration is only half the battle - keeping it alive is where the real challenge begins. Many foreign businesses secure broad protection for their brands across a wide range of goods and services, only to discover years later that their registrations are vulnerable to non-use cancellation. What if your products haven’t yet entered the Vietnamese market? What if your app or website is used by Vietnamese consumers but your company is based abroad? Does that count as “use”? Vietnam’s IP Law draws a fine line between registered rights and active rights - and the distinction can...

Continue reading

“Bad Faith”, “Conflict of Rights”, and “IP Abuse” in Vietnam: What Lessons Can Be Drawn from the “Foellie” Trademark Dispute?

On 15 September 2025, the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (“VN IPO”) issued a Decision No. 205432/QĐ-SHTT annulling the validity of Certificate of Trademark Registration No. 525787 for “FOELLIE” in the name of Lưu Ngọc Anh, thereby ending four years of dispute and bringing an end to a pattern of abusive assertions of IP rights. For Laorganic Co., Ltd. (Korea) - the true proprietor of the “” (“Foellie”) mark - this Decision is not merely a matter of victory or defeat. Beyond restoring their name as the rightful owner, it revives the entire commercial flow that had been throttled by...

Continue reading

Freedom to Operate (FTO) in Vietnam: Why and How you can conduct an FTO before product launching?

Launching a product in Vietnam without an FTO check is like driving at night with the headlights off, possible, but risky and expensive. Vietnam recognizes utility solutions (utility models), a powerful doctrine of equivalents in infringement analysis, and broad “Bolar”-style regulatory approval exceptions. Knowing which of these helps you, and which hurts you, often decides whether your launch flies or stalls. For foreign enterprises considering entry into the Vietnamese market, conducting a Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) search is not a simple administrative box to check; it is a critical, proactive tool for risk mitigation and strategic business planning. In a rapidly evolving economic...

Continue reading

Punitive Damages in Trademark Infringement: From a Chinese Precedent to a Legal Void in Vietnam

The act of “repeat infringement” has long been considered a basis for imposing harsher sanctions, including punitive damages. China’s legal system expressly allows this approach, but proving repeat infringement in practice requires a clear and convincing chain of evidence. A recent ruling by the People’s Court of Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, in a dispute involving Cartier, illustrates how Chinese courts evaluate evidence to establish repeat infringement and justify punitive damages. The case highlights the practical methods right holders can employ to strengthen their claims, while also exposing the current legal gap in Vietnam, where punitive damages remain unavailable. Background Cartier, a globally recognized...

Continue reading

Trademark Enforcement in Laos: A Smart Strategy in a High-Risk Region

What are the options for a trademark owner if their trademark is illegally used in Laos - one of Southeast Asia's most challenging jurisdictions? This was the critical question facing Luk Fook Company, a leading international jewelry brand, when its trademark was found to be in unauthorized use at a storefront within the Golden Triangle Special Economic Zone, a region in Bokeo Province, Laos, known for its legal ambiguity and illicit activities. Although enforcement in such jurisdictions may appear impractical or fraught with risk, Luk Fook Company’s enforcement strategy demonstrates that targeted legal intervention, executed with precision and discretion, can yield...

Continue reading

Determining Illegal Gains from Intellectual Property Infringement in Vietnam

Depriving infringers of all benefits obtained from their unlawful acts is a core principle intended to deter violations and eliminate the motivation to infringe. Vietnamese law has established a clear system of regulations for identifying and handling illegal gains, or illicit profits, that organizations and individuals obtain from infringing upon intellectual property (IP) rights. However, the mechanisms for determining and calculating these infringing profits are not uniform and vary depending on the context of the proceedings: from administrative sanctions to civil lawsuits and criminal prosecution. Therefore, a thorough understanding of how to apply the appropriate method for each type of...

Continue reading

Copyright and Goods: The Right Distinction for Effective IP Protection at Vietnam’s Borders

Why can a company holding a valid copyright certificate be denied customs supervision measures? A recent case involving a Korean copyright owner and Vietnamese customs has exposed a frustrating gap between legal theory and practical IP enforcement. When a request for customs supervision was submitted based on a Copyright Registration Certificate for the packaging of the "FOELLIE INNER PERFUME" product, the Customs Department temporarily refused, declining to accept the customs supervision request....

Continue reading

How wilful trademark infringement is recognised in Vietnam?

Download In Vietnam, wilful trademark infringement is recognized when someone knowingly and intentionally uses a protected trademark without the owner's permission, in a way that causes confusion or exploits the brand’s reputation. Willful trademark infringement is recognized through both administrative and criminal actions. Administrative actions involve imposing fines and other penalties by authorities for infringing activities, while criminal actions, involving more severe penalties, are pursued when the infringement is considered to be on a commercial scale or involves counterfeit goods. The deliberate and intentional nature of an infringement not only affects the severity of penalties but also influences the overall approach to combating...

Continue reading