在越南恶意注册商标：如何证明申请人的意图和动机？

要证明商标申请是“恶意”提出的，不仅必须证明申请人“知道”或“有理由知道”合法商标所有者的商标，还必须证明申请人在注册背后有特定的意图或动机。根据第 23/2023/TT-BKHCN 号通知第 34.2(b) 条，第二个条件侧重于申请人的动机和意图。这些意图和动机包括哪些行为？容易证明吗？为了帮助真正的知识产权权利人理解相关规定，KENFOX IP & Law Office 提供以下分析和解释。在此基础上，他们可以确定为证明目的需要收集哪些文件和证据。 To prove that a trademark application was filed in “bad faith”, it must be shown not only that the applicant “knew” or “had a basis to know” about the mark of the legitimate trademark owner but also that the applicant had a specific intention or motive behind the registration. As per Article 34.2(b) of Circular 23/2023/TT-BKHCN, this second condition focuses on the motives and intentions of the applicant. What actions do these intentions and motives include? Is it easy to prove? KENFOX IP & Law Office provides the following analysis and interpretation...

03 1月

0 Comments

Sticky

“Fabrilcar” 对比 “FABRICA” 及 “FABRICAIR”: 如何在越南成功上诉商标驳回？

Posted by Vu Thu Uyen

in 商标

[vc_row triangle_shape="no"][vc_column][vc_column_text] 2024年10月16日，越南知识产权局（“IP VIETNAM”）发布了关于接受第1470915号国际注册申请的决定，该申请涉及Aspöck Systems GmbH公司名下的 "Fabrilcar" 商标，并撤回了其先前的驳回决定，结束了长达四年的上诉程序。这对我们的客户Aspöck Systems GmbH来说是一次巨大的胜利。Aspöck Systems GmbH是一家成立于1977年9月的奥地利公司，专门从事车辆照明系统的开发和制造。 On 16/10/2024, the IP Offfice of Vietnam (“IP VIETNAM“) issued a Decision on acceptance of IR No. 1470915 for the mark "Fabrilcar" in the name of Aspöck Systems GmbH, withdrawing its provisional refusal decision and terminating a lengthy 4-year appeal process. This is a great victory for our client, Aspöck Systems GmbH, an Austrian company that specializes in developing and manufacturing lighting systems for vehicles, founded in September 1977. 指定越南的第1470915号国际注册申请 "Fabrilcar" 商标，因被认为与引证商标 “FABRICA” 和 “FABRICAIR” 近似，其第11类和第37类所有商品和服务，以及第09类部分商品和第35类部分服务，均遭到了临时驳回。 The mark “Fabrilcar” under IR No. 1470915, designating Vietnam, faced a provisional refusal for all goods...